Thesis: Of the persuasive games, "Terrorist Alert" and "Political Duel", the latter is more effective in suggesting that war is really a battle between politicians rather than nations in its one on one combat style, as well as its suggestive player and weaponry options.
Outline:
Introduction: Restate thesis statement with supportive examples of weaponry.
Body 1: Focus on one on one combat style in "Political Duel" vs. the first person shooter in "Terrorist Alert" and why the one on one combat is more effective in persuading the audience.
Body 2: Discuss the political leaders that are used in each game and why some of those used by "Political Duel" are more controversial and well known than those used in "Terrorist Alert".
Body 3: Give specific examples of each politicians' arsenal and what that suggests about war and the leaders of the world. Explain why this suggestive arsenal is more persuasive than using a generic gun to kill the enemy.
Conclusion: Reiterate main idea of thesis statement.
4 comments:
Your thesis statement is amazing and I love they way you outlined your paper, you put really good details.
I think your thesis statement and outline is going to turn into a really effective paper. I like the way you set up your paragraphs to prove your point and your thesis makes a strong statement.
thesis ties into rest of paper good. The only critique i have is too extend your conclusion
I love your thesis and I think that this will be a really good paper just adds some more details.
Post a Comment